🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, though, could coincide so closely with the mythologized version promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it functions as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Manufactured Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its pop-culture machine have collaborated to forge a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This figure is a political superhero devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series launched last fall, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “save” the nation from disorder. While the character's name Mikhail, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. An adaptation based on a popular book aims to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the political machinery around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, the president is presented as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. He replies is that he would rather govern from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one actually pleaded with him to take the job. The position was effectively a selection process with many contenders. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the state in practice.

• His list featured various figures, including an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the events stated the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of him as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by the actor's arrival as James Bond. His harder version prompted Russian media and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Mashup posters replacing the actor's likeness with Putin’s appeared on city centers, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the authorities will not miss the opportunity to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of public dissent, the opposition, or key figures in the story, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who never appears directly. He is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it might seek to question.