🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting changes to a draft bill that include lowering the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid wider concerns about business sector influence with health policies. Recently, WHO officials raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” stated Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the company recommends this be decreased to 30% or 50% “following international suggested parameters”, delayed for at least twelve months after the legislation is approved.

The WHO actually suggests a warning should cover at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for various offences “varying from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but asserts that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We reside in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and harvest that and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are dying … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative said: “The corporation runs its activities following with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, noting that young individuals should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to accomplish desired public health goals, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, adding that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which involves increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.